Lots more stupid in the original article.
From a few posts prior, he says:
…embeds a couple of paragraphs of argument in a dozen paragraphs consisting of ***ing and moaning that no one likes him, and gratuitous insults directed at the New Atheists: …
He finally does mention an argument:
So, isn’t that nice. The obvious consistency issue concerning the “gratuitous” insults complained about and then promptly offered himself is quite indicative of the level of thought that went into his post. However, I must point out that at least the person he is complaining about actually *made* an argument. I don’t know about you, but I’m not impressed at his categorization.
Name calling: It’s what’s considered content.