Just an excursion into what I typically tell folks new to the method.
Is what you defend the same thing you can preach and confirm?
Mailbag followup, Justin Lee, and homosexuality.
Yes, I know – this took forever. But, this is the long-promised edition that outlines the necessary theological and doctrinal issues that underpin a Covenantal Apologetic. It is a response to a correspondent who asked me several questions, so I turned it into an impromptu “introduction”. Hope it’s helpful.
Is what you believe, what you preach, and what you defend consistent with itself?
Some people think Fristianity is a “Silver Bullet” objection to Covenantal Apologetics. Are they correct?
Matthias, Joshua and Justin discuss the intrinsic ties between synergism and evidentialism, and the theological foundation of Covenantal apologetics in this edition of Point of Contact.
Is it consistent to be involved in youth ministry as well as CA? I address this assertion sans argument in a short edition.
When we say that Covenantal Apologetics is Sola Scriptura in an apologetic context, what do we mean by that, and where do we find this in Scripture? Additionally, in summary form, we examine where in these texts we can see the various tenets of CA displayed for us.
Matthias McMahon, Justin McCurry and I discuss the comments of a Sean Holloway in the Association of Evangelical Apologists facebook group.